Punjab opposition leader sentenced to 10 years in May 9 case

Punjab opposition leader sentenced to 10 years in May 9 case

Punjab Assembly Opposition Leader Sentenced to 10 Years

A Sargodha Anti‑Terrorism Court (ATC) on 22 July 2025 sentenced Malik Ahmed Khan Bhachar, Punjab Assembly Opposition Leader Sentenced to 10 Years imprisonment under anti-terrorism laws. He was accused of inciting riots, engaging in vandalism, and attacking public and military installations during the violent nationwide protests on 9 May 2023, following the arrest of former PM Imran Khan .

Co‑Accused and Broader Context

Bhachar was sentenced alongside MNA Ahmed Chattha, MNA Bilal Ejaz, and approximately 29 other PTI-affiliated figures, bringing the total accused in this case to 32 individuals, each handed a 10‑year sentence All were granted exemptions from personal court appearances during the trial

PTI’s Reaction: “Black Day for Democracy”

PTI leaders denounced the verdict as politically motivated. MPA Moeen Riaz Qureshi called it a “black day of democracy,” citing a lack of credible evidence and alleging that the judicial process was manipulated Bhachar has confirmed he will appeal to the Lahore High Court.

Wider Fallout

  • The case stems from nationwide violence on 9 May 2023, involving vandalism of military sites, state buildings, and riots across multiple cities
  • Several PTI leaders faced simultaneous legal action—some already tried in military courts, with pardons granted to a few, though hundreds remain detained

What Happens Next?

  • The PTI will challenge the ATC’s ruling in the Lahore High Court, seeking to overturn what they call an unjust verdict
  • The federal government aims to proceed with similar May 9-related trials against other PTI leaders, reinforcing its stance that the rule of law applies equally to all x

In summary: A major legal setback for PTI, with senior leadership convicted under anti-terrorism charges for their role in the May 9, 2023 riots. The party vehemently rejects the verdict as politically biased, and the battle now moves to the Lahore High Court.

Read More:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *